ARM11: write_memory() avoids increment check
authorDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:40:37 +0000 (18:40 -0800)
committerDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:40:37 +0000 (18:40 -0800)
When writing to a chip's "reset yourself" register, the ARM11 code
was reporting a spurious failure.  Just don't bother checking for
correctly incremented pointers given single-unit writes ... it's
a bit faster that way too.  (Reads should likely do the same thing.
For that matter, such checks are usually just a waste...)

Shrink an overlong parameter name, and associated lines'o'code.

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
src/target/arm11.c

index 7c6d39c9d42123d9163856e831c3223923e08459..daba3b847cc4cfb88a0b1d36dda73e947179bb4c 100644 (file)
@@ -989,13 +989,14 @@ static int arm11_read_memory(struct target *target, uint32_t address, uint32_t s
 }
 
 /*
-* arm11_config_memrw_no_increment - in the future we may want to be able
+* no_increment - in the future we may want to be able
 * to read/write a range of data to a "port". a "port" is an action on
 * read memory address for some peripheral.
 */
 static int arm11_write_memory_inner(struct target *target,
-               uint32_t address, uint32_t size, uint32_t count, uint8_t *buffer,
-               bool arm11_config_memrw_no_increment)
+               uint32_t address, uint32_t size,
+               uint32_t count, uint8_t *buffer,
+               bool no_increment)
 {
        int retval;
 
@@ -1043,7 +1044,9 @@ static int arm11_write_memory_inner(struct target *target,
                                /* strb    r1, [r0], #1 */
                                /* strb    r1, [r0] */
                                retval = arm11_run_instr_no_data1(arm11,
-                                       !arm11_config_memrw_no_increment ? 0xe4c01001 : 0xe5c01000);
+                                       !no_increment
+                                               ? 0xe4c01001
+                                               : 0xe5c01000);
                                if (retval != ERROR_OK)
                                        return retval;
                        }
@@ -1068,7 +1071,9 @@ static int arm11_write_memory_inner(struct target *target,
                                /* strh    r1, [r0], #2 */
                                /* strh    r1, [r0] */
                                retval = arm11_run_instr_no_data1(arm11,
-                                       !arm11_config_memrw_no_increment ? 0xe0c010b2 : 0xe1c010b0);
+                                       !no_increment
+                                               ? 0xe0c010b2
+                                               : 0xe1c010b0);
                                if (retval != ERROR_OK)
                                        return retval;
                        }
@@ -1077,7 +1082,7 @@ static int arm11_write_memory_inner(struct target *target,
                }
 
        case 4: {
-               uint32_t instr = !arm11_config_memrw_no_increment ? 0xeca05e01 : 0xed805e00;
+               uint32_t instr = !no_increment ? 0xeca05e01 : 0xed805e00;
 
                /** \todo TODO: buffer cast to uint32_t* causes alignment warnings */
                uint32_t *words = (uint32_t*)buffer;
@@ -1104,7 +1109,7 @@ static int arm11_write_memory_inner(struct target *target,
        }
 
        /* r0 verification */
-       if (!arm11_config_memrw_no_increment)
+       if (!no_increment)
        {
                uint32_t r0;
 
@@ -1132,9 +1137,14 @@ static int arm11_write_memory_inner(struct target *target,
 }
 
 static int arm11_write_memory(struct target *target,
-               uint32_t address, uint32_t size, uint32_t count, uint8_t *buffer)
+               uint32_t address, uint32_t size,
+               uint32_t count, uint8_t *buffer)
 {
-       return arm11_write_memory_inner(target, address, size, count, buffer, false);
+       /* pointer increment matters only for multi-unit writes ...
+        * not e.g. to a "reset the chip" controller.
+        */
+       return arm11_write_memory_inner(target, address, size,
+                       count, buffer, count == 1);
 }
 
 /* write target memory in multiples of 4 byte, optimized for writing large quantities of data */

Linking to existing account procedure

If you already have an account and want to add another login method you MUST first sign in with your existing account and then change URL to read https://review.openocd.org/login/?link to get to this page again but this time it'll work for linking. Thank you.

SSH host keys fingerprints

1024 SHA256:YKx8b7u5ZWdcbp7/4AeXNaqElP49m6QrwfXaqQGJAOk gerrit-code-review@openocd.zylin.com (DSA)
384 SHA256:jHIbSQa4REvwCFG4cq5LBlBLxmxSqelQPem/EXIrxjk gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
521 SHA256:UAOPYkU9Fjtcao0Ul/Rrlnj/OsQvt+pgdYSZ4jOYdgs gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
256 SHA256:A13M5QlnozFOvTllybRZH6vm7iSt0XLxbA48yfc2yfY gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
256 SHA256:spYMBqEYoAOtK7yZBrcwE8ZpYt6b68Cfh9yEVetvbXg gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ED25519)
+--[ED25519 256]--+
|=..              |
|+o..   .         |
|*.o   . .        |
|+B . . .         |
|Bo. = o S        |
|Oo.+ + =         |
|oB=.* = . o      |
| =+=.+   + E     |
|. .=o   . o      |
+----[SHA256]-----+
2048 SHA256:0Onrb7/PHjpo6iVZ7xQX2riKN83FJ3KGU0TvI0TaFG4 gerrit-code-review@openocd.zylin.com (RSA)