NOR: make flash_write_unlock() pad to sector end
[openocd.git] / src / flash / nor / core.c
index fe5372b6cd7cb901a752d0336289764f739708cc..5eb51cd2dad99dcfe58ed5552ea0202b6c4e1daa 100644 (file)
@@ -439,9 +439,26 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
                {
                        if (image->sections[section_last + 1].base_address < (run_address + run_size))
                        {
-                               LOG_DEBUG("section %d out of order(very slightly surprising, but supported)", section_last + 1);
+                               LOG_DEBUG("section %d out of order "
+                                               "(surprising, but supported)",
+                                               section_last + 1);
+                               /* REVISIT this can break with autoerase ...
+                                * clobbering data after it's written.
+                                */
                                break;
                        }
+
+                       /* REVISIT This needlessly touches sectors BETWEEN the
+                        * sections it's writing.  Without auto erase, it just
+                        * writes ones; unlikely to destroy data.
+                        *
+                        * With auto erase enabled, data in those sectors will
+                        * be needlessly destroyed; and some of the limited
+                        * number of flash erase cycles will be wasted...
+                        *
+                        * In both cases, the extra writes slow things down.
+                        */
+
                        /* if we have multiple sections within our image, flash programming could fail due to alignment issues
                         * attempt to rebuild a consecutive buffer for the flash loader */
                        pad_bytes = (image->sections[section_last + 1].base_address) - (run_address + run_size);
@@ -450,7 +467,6 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
                        padding[section_last] = pad_bytes;
                        run_size += image->sections[++section_last].size;
                        run_size += pad_bytes;
-                       padding[section_last] = 0;
 
                        LOG_INFO("Padding image section %d with %d bytes", section_last-1, pad_bytes);
                }
@@ -458,11 +474,35 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
                /* fit the run into bank constraints */
                if (run_address + run_size - 1 > c->base + c->size - 1)
                {
+                       /* REVISIT isn't this superfluous, given the while()
+                        * loop conditions above??
+                        */
                        LOG_WARNING("writing %d bytes only - as image section is %d bytes and bank is only %d bytes", \
                                    (int)(c->base + c->size - run_address), (int)(run_size), (int)(c->size));
                        run_size = c->base + c->size - run_address;
                }
 
+               /* If we're applying any sector automagic, then pad this
+                * (maybe-combined) segment to the end of its last sector.
+                */
+               if (unlock || erase) {
+                       int sector;
+                       uint32_t offset_start = run_address - c->base;
+                       uint32_t offset_end = offset_start + run_size;
+                       uint32_t end = offset_end, delta;
+
+                       for (sector = 0; sector < c->num_sectors; sector++) {
+                               end = c->sectors[sector].offset
+                                               + c->sectors[sector].size;
+                               if (offset_end <= end)
+                                       break;
+                       }
+
+                       delta = end - offset_end;
+                       padding[section_last] += delta;
+                       run_size += delta;
+               }
+
                /* allocate buffer */
                buffer = malloc(run_size);
                buffer_size = 0;

Linking to existing account procedure

If you already have an account and want to add another login method you MUST first sign in with your existing account and then change URL to read https://review.openocd.org/login/?link to get to this page again but this time it'll work for linking. Thank you.

SSH host keys fingerprints

1024 SHA256:YKx8b7u5ZWdcbp7/4AeXNaqElP49m6QrwfXaqQGJAOk gerrit-code-review@openocd.zylin.com (DSA)
384 SHA256:jHIbSQa4REvwCFG4cq5LBlBLxmxSqelQPem/EXIrxjk gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
521 SHA256:UAOPYkU9Fjtcao0Ul/Rrlnj/OsQvt+pgdYSZ4jOYdgs gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
256 SHA256:A13M5QlnozFOvTllybRZH6vm7iSt0XLxbA48yfc2yfY gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
256 SHA256:spYMBqEYoAOtK7yZBrcwE8ZpYt6b68Cfh9yEVetvbXg gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ED25519)
+--[ED25519 256]--+
|=..              |
|+o..   .         |
|*.o   . .        |
|+B . . .         |
|Bo. = o S        |
|Oo.+ + =         |
|oB=.* = . o      |
| =+=.+   + E     |
|. .=o   . o      |
+----[SHA256]-----+
2048 SHA256:0Onrb7/PHjpo6iVZ7xQX2riKN83FJ3KGU0TvI0TaFG4 gerrit-code-review@openocd.zylin.com (RSA)