ARM11: avoid pointless status returns
authorDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:38:36 +0000 (15:38 -0800)
committerDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:55:12 +0000 (20:55 -0800)
For some routines that only returned ERROR_OK and where the
caller never checked ... don't bother.  Remove some noise,
and bugfix some comments.

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
src/target/arm11_dbgtap.c
src/target/arm11_dbgtap.h

index 554d6e2b99f7acdb3166a62be308a8fc1851ecc9..088981f8ba882e6979f424c9c20815a0ab812ee4 100644 (file)
@@ -48,14 +48,14 @@ static const tap_state_t arm11_move_pi_to_si_via_ci[] =
 };
 
 
-static int arm11_add_ir_scan_vc(int num_fields, struct scan_field *fields,
+/* REVISIT no error handling here! */
+static void arm11_add_ir_scan_vc(int num_fields, struct scan_field *fields,
                tap_state_t state)
 {
        if (cmd_queue_cur_state == TAP_IRPAUSE)
                jtag_add_pathmove(ARRAY_SIZE(arm11_move_pi_to_si_via_ci), arm11_move_pi_to_si_via_ci);
 
        jtag_add_ir_scan(num_fields, fields, state);
-       return ERROR_OK;
 }
 
 static const tap_state_t arm11_move_pd_to_sd_via_cd[] =
@@ -63,13 +63,14 @@ static const tap_state_t arm11_move_pd_to_sd_via_cd[] =
        TAP_DREXIT2, TAP_DRUPDATE, TAP_DRSELECT, TAP_DRCAPTURE, TAP_DRSHIFT
 };
 
-int arm11_add_dr_scan_vc(int num_fields, struct scan_field *fields, tap_state_t state)
+/* REVISIT no error handling here! */
+void arm11_add_dr_scan_vc(int num_fields, struct scan_field *fields,
+               tap_state_t state)
 {
        if (cmd_queue_cur_state == TAP_DRPAUSE)
                jtag_add_pathmove(ARRAY_SIZE(arm11_move_pd_to_sd_via_cd), arm11_move_pd_to_sd_via_cd);
 
        jtag_add_dr_scan(num_fields, fields, state);
-       return ERROR_OK;
 }
 
 
@@ -83,7 +84,8 @@ int arm11_add_dr_scan_vc(int num_fields, struct scan_field *fields, tap_state_t
  *                                             <em > (data is written when the JTAG queue is executed)</em>
  * \param field                        target data structure that will be initialized
  */
-void arm11_setup_field(struct arm11_common * arm11, int num_bits, void * out_data, void * in_data, struct scan_field * field)
+void arm11_setup_field(struct arm11_common *arm11, int num_bits,
+               void *out_data, void *in_data, struct scan_field *field)
 {
        field->tap                      = arm11->arm.target->tap;
        field->num_bits                 = num_bits;
@@ -151,24 +153,17 @@ void arm11_add_IR(struct arm11_common * arm11, uint8_t instr, tap_state_t state)
        arm11_add_ir_scan_vc(1, &field, state == ARM11_TAP_DEFAULT ? TAP_IRPAUSE : state);
 }
 
-/** Verify shifted out data from Scan Chain Register (SCREG)
- *  Used as parameter to struct scan_field::in_handler in
- *  arm11_add_debug_SCAN_N().
- *
- */
+/** Verify data shifted out from Scan Chain Register (SCREG). */
 static void arm11_in_handler_SCAN_N(uint8_t *in_value)
 {
-       /** \todo TODO: clarify why this isnt properly masked in core.c jtag_read_buffer() */
+       /* Don't expect JTAG layer to modify bits we didn't ask it to read */
        uint8_t v = *in_value & 0x1F;
 
        if (v != 0x10)
        {
-               LOG_ERROR("'arm11 target' JTAG communication error SCREG SCAN OUT 0x%02x (expected 0x10)", v);
+               LOG_ERROR("'arm11 target' JTAG error SCREG OUT 0x%02x", v);
                jtag_set_error(ERROR_FAIL);
        }
-
-       if (v != 0x10)
-               JTAG_DEBUG("SCREG SCAN OUT 0x%02x", v);
 }
 
 /** Select and write to Scan Chain Register (SCREG)
index 3139a09afe99bc1cb43d620854e03884950fb813..7f87e3a07a9ae5a68b3c68f13bfad49175ee05bc 100644 (file)
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int arm11_run_instr_data_from_core_via_r0(struct arm11_common *arm11,
 int arm11_run_instr_data_to_core_via_r0(struct arm11_common *arm11,
                uint32_t opcode, uint32_t data);
 
-int arm11_add_dr_scan_vc(int num_fields, struct scan_field *fields,
+void arm11_add_dr_scan_vc(int num_fields, struct scan_field *fields,
                tap_state_t state);
 
 /**

Linking to existing account procedure

If you already have an account and want to add another login method you MUST first sign in with your existing account and then change URL to read https://review.openocd.org/login/?link to get to this page again but this time it'll work for linking. Thank you.

SSH host keys fingerprints

1024 SHA256:YKx8b7u5ZWdcbp7/4AeXNaqElP49m6QrwfXaqQGJAOk gerrit-code-review@openocd.zylin.com (DSA)
384 SHA256:jHIbSQa4REvwCFG4cq5LBlBLxmxSqelQPem/EXIrxjk gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
521 SHA256:UAOPYkU9Fjtcao0Ul/Rrlnj/OsQvt+pgdYSZ4jOYdgs gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
256 SHA256:A13M5QlnozFOvTllybRZH6vm7iSt0XLxbA48yfc2yfY gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
256 SHA256:spYMBqEYoAOtK7yZBrcwE8ZpYt6b68Cfh9yEVetvbXg gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ED25519)
+--[ED25519 256]--+
|=..              |
|+o..   .         |
|*.o   . .        |
|+B . . .         |
|Bo. = o S        |
|Oo.+ + =         |
|oB=.* = . o      |
| =+=.+   + E     |
|. .=o   . o      |
+----[SHA256]-----+
2048 SHA256:0Onrb7/PHjpo6iVZ7xQX2riKN83FJ3KGU0TvI0TaFG4 gerrit-code-review@openocd.zylin.com (RSA)