arm7_9_common: fix host endianness bug in arm7_9_full_context() 43/5943/2
authorAntonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:29:04 +0000 (12:29 +0100)
committerAntonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Sat, 5 Dec 2020 23:18:29 +0000 (23:18 +0000)
The original code passes to ->read_core_regs() and to
->read_xpsr() the pointer to the little-endian buffer reg.value.
This is incorrect because the two functions above require a
pointer to uint32_t, since they already run the conversion with
arm_le_to_h_u32() in the jtag callback.
This causes a mismatch on big-endian host and the registers get
read with the incorrect endianness.

Use an intermediate buffer to read the registers as uint32_t and
to track the destination reg.value pointer, then copy the value in
reg.value after the call to jtag_execute_queue().

Tested with qemu-armeb and an OpenOCD built through buildroot
configured for cortex-a7 big-endian.

Note that if jtag_execute_queue() fails, the openocd register
cache is not updated, so the already modified flags 'valid' and
'dirty' are incorrect. This part should be moved after the call to
jtag_execute_queue() too.

Change-Id: Iba70d964ffbb74bf0860bfd9d299f218e3bc65bf
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/5943
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
src/target/arm7_9_common.c

index d70d27377e1311f66e1eb57f679d321d79b6bb30..d992aa78bc62713ec33b9de5f31397e6f4b3a8b8 100644 (file)
@@ -1391,6 +1391,11 @@ static int arm7_9_full_context(struct target *target)
        int retval;
        struct arm7_9_common *arm7_9 = target_to_arm7_9(target);
        struct arm *arm = &arm7_9->arm;
+       struct {
+               uint32_t value;
+               void *reg_p;
+       } read_cache[6 * (16 + 1)];
+       int read_cache_idx = 0;
 
        LOG_DEBUG("-");
 
@@ -1433,10 +1438,12 @@ static int arm7_9_full_context(struct target *target)
                        for (j = 0; j < 15; j++) {
                                if (!ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE(arm->core_cache,
                                                armv4_5_number_to_mode(i), j).valid) {
-                                       reg_p[j] = (uint32_t *)ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE(
+                                       read_cache[read_cache_idx].reg_p = ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE(
                                                        arm->core_cache,
                                                        armv4_5_number_to_mode(i),
                                                        j).value;
+                                       reg_p[j] = &read_cache[read_cache_idx].value;
+                                       read_cache_idx++;
                                        mask |= 1 << j;
                                        ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE(arm->core_cache,
                                                armv4_5_number_to_mode(i),
@@ -1454,9 +1461,10 @@ static int arm7_9_full_context(struct target *target)
                        /* check if the PSR has to be read */
                        if (!ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE(arm->core_cache, armv4_5_number_to_mode(i),
                                        16).valid) {
-                               arm7_9->read_xpsr(target,
-                                       (uint32_t *)ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE(arm->core_cache,
-                                               armv4_5_number_to_mode(i), 16).value, 1);
+                               read_cache[read_cache_idx].reg_p = ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE(arm->core_cache,
+                                       armv4_5_number_to_mode(i), 16).value;
+                               arm7_9->read_xpsr(target, &read_cache[read_cache_idx].value, 1);
+                               read_cache_idx++;
                                ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE(arm->core_cache, armv4_5_number_to_mode(i),
                                        16).valid = true;
                                ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE(arm->core_cache, armv4_5_number_to_mode(i),
@@ -1472,6 +1480,14 @@ static int arm7_9_full_context(struct target *target)
        retval = jtag_execute_queue();
        if (retval != ERROR_OK)
                return retval;
+       /*
+        * FIXME: regs in cache should be tagged as 'valid' only now,
+        * not before the jtag_execute_queue()
+        */
+       while (read_cache_idx) {
+               read_cache_idx--;
+               buf_set_u32(read_cache[read_cache_idx].reg_p, 0, 32, read_cache[read_cache_idx].value);
+       }
        return ERROR_OK;
 }
 

Linking to existing account procedure

If you already have an account and want to add another login method you MUST first sign in with your existing account and then change URL to read https://review.openocd.org/login/?link to get to this page again but this time it'll work for linking. Thank you.

SSH host keys fingerprints

1024 SHA256:YKx8b7u5ZWdcbp7/4AeXNaqElP49m6QrwfXaqQGJAOk gerrit-code-review@openocd.zylin.com (DSA)
384 SHA256:jHIbSQa4REvwCFG4cq5LBlBLxmxSqelQPem/EXIrxjk gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
521 SHA256:UAOPYkU9Fjtcao0Ul/Rrlnj/OsQvt+pgdYSZ4jOYdgs gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
256 SHA256:A13M5QlnozFOvTllybRZH6vm7iSt0XLxbA48yfc2yfY gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ECDSA)
256 SHA256:spYMBqEYoAOtK7yZBrcwE8ZpYt6b68Cfh9yEVetvbXg gerrit-code-review@openocd.org (ED25519)
+--[ED25519 256]--+
|=..              |
|+o..   .         |
|*.o   . .        |
|+B . . .         |
|Bo. = o S        |
|Oo.+ + =         |
|oB=.* = . o      |
| =+=.+   + E     |
|. .=o   . o      |
+----[SHA256]-----+
2048 SHA256:0Onrb7/PHjpo6iVZ7xQX2riKN83FJ3KGU0TvI0TaFG4 gerrit-code-review@openocd.zylin.com (RSA)