lpcspifi: assume flash is unprotected after probing

Since the driver doesn't support any hardware flash protection, it
doesn't make sense to report "protected" status after probing, as it
requires extra commands to unprotect before flashing and might be
confusing for the end-users.

Change-Id: I04d96790cc42412df5334951f39fb6723c972ced
Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/1525
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>

diff --git a/src/flash/nor/lpcspifi.c b/src/flash/nor/lpcspifi.c
index dfd8645e7d9083ef8bf7eeb2b164d77632551ff3..0c12e64180dbae9fb2ce2a1c966de901dd200bf6 100644 (file)
--- a/src/flash/nor/lpcspifi.c
+++ b/src/flash/nor/lpcspifi.c
@@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static int lpcspifi_probe(struct flash_bank *bank)
                sectors[sector].offset = sector * lpcspifi_info->dev->sectorsize;
                sectors[sector].size = lpcspifi_info->dev->sectorsize;
                sectors[sector].is_erased = -1;
-               sectors[sector].is_protected = 1;
+               sectors[sector].is_protected = 0;
        }
 
        bank->sectors = sectors;