lpcspifi: assume flash is unprotected after probing 25/1525/2
authorPaul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:15:32 +0000 (20:15 +0400)
committerAndreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:20:35 +0000 (14:20 +0000)
Since the driver doesn't support any hardware flash protection, it
doesn't make sense to report "protected" status after probing, as it
requires extra commands to unprotect before flashing and might be
confusing for the end-users.

Change-Id: I04d96790cc42412df5334951f39fb6723c972ced
Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/1525
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
src/flash/nor/lpcspifi.c

index dfd8645..0c12e64 100644 (file)
@@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static int lpcspifi_probe(struct flash_bank *bank)
                sectors[sector].offset = sector * lpcspifi_info->dev->sectorsize;
                sectors[sector].size = lpcspifi_info->dev->sectorsize;
                sectors[sector].is_erased = -1;
-               sectors[sector].is_protected = 1;
+               sectors[sector].is_protected = 0;
        }
 
        bank->sectors = sectors;